Pages

Spike in Harm to Liver Is Tied to Dietary Aids - NYTimes.com

Spike in Harm to Liver Is Tied to Dietary Aids - NYTimes.com

Why markets do not always work: fraud.

But a federal law enacted in 1994, the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act, prevents the Food and Drug Administration from approving or evaluating most supplements before they are sold. Usually the agency must wait until consumers are harmed before officials can remove products from stores. Because the supplement industry operates on the honor system, studies show, the market has been flooded with products that are adulterated, mislabeled or packaged in dosages that have not been studied for safety.

Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson Gives Drew Magary a Tour

Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson Gives Drew Magary a Tour

As we speed along, a speck of mud gets on my shirt—OMG MUD EWW SO GROSS!—and I flick it away. Meanwhile, Phil sits next to me, and his whole life is caked in mud. He’s been out here plunging his hands into the earth and ripping the heads off ducks while I’ve been in suburbia with my thumb up my ass. I feel both inadequate and ungrateful. There’s only one way to absolve myself, I figure, and that is to shoot the fuck out of this crossbow.

What is Duck Dynasty?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/12/20/9-questions-you-were-too-embarrassed-to-ask-about-duck-dynasty/

Saturday, December 14, 2013

CONVERSABLE ECONOMIST: Compression of Morbidity

CONVERSABLE ECONOMIST: Compression of Morbidity:

"We already have the magic pill that produces compression of morbidity. It's called exercise."

Washington Center for Equitable Growth | Does America’s Future Contain Elite Public Universities?

Washington Center for Equitable Growth | Does America’s Future Contain Elite Public Universities?:

The fever of the MOOC has broken. As we got to have suspected all along, the students who will benefit enormously from MOOCs and Kahn Academy and so forth are the students with a cognitive skills, energy, and persistence to have been able to learn from the open University on TV, or programmed instruction, or simply picking up a book. For those who do not have the requisite skill, energy and persistence, the coming of the MOOC and of education over the Internet will do little: If they are to learn effectively, they need to be embedded in the social matrix of a university–classes and deadlines and attendance and tests and papers and peers around them all doing the same. And those who do not need this sociological matrix are a small minority, even at Berkeley.

Beating the Market, as a Reachable Goal - NYTimes.com

Russell 3000 Index beats this guy on 3, 5 and 10 year record. Why Can't We have a better PressCorps?
Beating the Market, as a Reachable Goal - NYTimes.com

Quote For The Day � The Dish

Quote For The Day � The Dish:

“While the earnings of a minority are growing exponentially, so too is the gap separating the majority from the prosperity enjoyed by those happy few. This imbalance is the result of ideologies which defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial speculation. Consequently, they reject the right of states, charged with vigilance for the common good, to exercise any form of control.

A new tyranny is thus born, invisible and often virtual, which unilaterally and relentlessly imposes its own laws and rules. Debt and the accumulation of interest also make it difficult for countries to realize the potential of their own economies and keep citizens from enjoying their real purchasing power. To all this we can add widespread corruption and self-serving tax evasion, which have taken on worldwide dimensions. The thirst for power and possessions knows no limits. In this system, which tends to devour everything which stands in the way of increased profits, whatever is fragile, like the environment, is defenseless before the interests of a deified market, which become the only rule,” – Pope Francis.

Wonkbook: Washington has given up on growth

Wonkbook: Washington has given up on growth:


 “When a man has done what he considers his duty to his people and his country, he can rest in peace. I believe I have made that effort and that is, therefore, why I will sleep for eternity." -- Nelson Mandela.

Planet Money Makes A T-Shirt

Watch the entire film. It is worth it to show what goes behind global manufacturing.

Planet Money Makes A T-Shirt

Monday, December 02, 2013

Lunch with the FT: Ha-Joon Chang - FT.com

Lunch with the FT: Ha-Joon Chang - FT.com:

 “How has this wonderful subject we call economics become so narrow-minded? I find that really sad.”

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

U.S. Meatpackers Fight New Country-of-Origin Labels - WSJ.com

One of the few articles were I agree with the vast majority of the commentators. I guess that when safety regulations are close to home, even the right wing wants government to regulate. Corporates think that they can hide behind the slogan of "costly regulations".

U.S. Meatpackers Fight New Country-of-Origin Labels - WSJ.com

Walmart Employee Food Drive - Business Insider

Walmart heirs are six of the ten richest Americans. They have more assets than the bottom half.

Walmart Employee Food Drive - Business Insider

Friday, November 15, 2013

Larry Summers just confirmed that he is still a heavyweight on economic policy - Quartz

The entire speech is worth listening to:

Larry Summers just confirmed that he is still a heavyweight on economic policy - Quartz:

 Quote about Japan is stunning. Shows that predictions are hard, especially about the future.

"The extent of Japan’s stagnation is breathtaking: In 2013, the Japanese economy is only half the size economists in the 1990’s predicted it would be by now."

Kass: 10 Laws of Stock Market Bubbles - TheStreet

Kass: 10 Laws of Stock Market Bubbles - TheStreet:

Debt is cheap.
Debt is plentiful.
There is the egregious use of debt.
A new marginal (and sizeable) buyer of an asset class appears.
After a sustained advance in an asset class's price, the prior four factors lead to new-era thinking that cycles have been eradicated/eliminated and that a long boom in value lies ahead.
The distance of valuations from earnings is directly proportional to the degree of bubbliness.
The newer the valuation methodology in vogue the greater the degree of bubbliness.
Bad valuation methodologies drive out good valuation methodologies.
When everyone thinks central bankers, money managers, corporate managers, politicians or any other group are the smartest guys in the room, you are in a bubble.
Rapid growth of a new financial product that is not understood. (e.g., derivatives, what Warren Buffett termed "financial weapons of mass destruction").

Monday, November 04, 2013

NYTimes: Innovation Imperative: Change Everything

From The New York Times:

Innovation Imperative: Change Everything

Online education is beginning to show itself as a disruptive innovation, introducing more convenient and affordable services that can transform sectors.


http://nyti.ms/HjkluW

Here’s how GOP Obamacare hypocrisy backfires - Salon.com

Title is wrong. This is how Obamacare backfires. If it succeeds, it could mean the end of Medicare and Social Security.

Here’s how GOP Obamacare hypocrisy backfires - Salon.com

Quartz: There’s one key difference between kids who excel at math and those who don’t

http://qz.com/139453

"I'm just not a math person." We hear it all the time. And we've had enough. Because we believe that the idea of "math people" is the most self-destructive idea in America today. The truth is, you probably are a math person, and by thinking otherwise, you are possibly hamstringing your own career. Worse, you […]



Mark O'Friel
C: 914-907-7144
O: 617-903-0251
F : 419-710-3449

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Sunday, October 20, 2013

Saturday, October 19, 2013

U.S. Army Hones Antiterror Strategy for Africa, in Kansas - NYTimes.com

Why can they not just stay home and rest? Why must they seek new missions?

"the United States military out of Iraq and pulling out of Afghanistan, the Army is looking for new missions around the world."


U.S. Army Hones Antiterror Strategy for Africa, in Kansas - NYTimes.com:

Revisiting “Moneyball” with Paul DePodesta - Issue 4: The Unlikely - Nautilus

DePodesta was one of those who first brought statistical analysis to baseball. As Kuhn describes in the history of scientific revolutions, this was a change in the paradigm. Everyone had been doing scouting the same way before. After DePodesta, sports scouting methods have radically changed. It is interesting, fun and profitable to be part of an industry at that fluxuation point.  

Revisiting “Moneyball” with Paul DePodesta - Issue 4: The Unlikely - Nautilus

Five policies for effective teaching

Getting beneath the Veil of Effective Schools: Evidence from New York City:

" five policies suggested by qualitative research—frequent teacher feedback, the use of data to guide instruction, high-dosage tutoring, increased instructional time, and high expectations— explains approximately 45 percent of the variation in school effectiveness."

Tuesday, October 08, 2013

Leave Boehner Alone!

Personalities and relationships sometimes matter more than policies.
If you want to get stuff done, maintain good relationships.

Leave Boehner Alone!

Thursday, September 26, 2013

Friday, September 13, 2013

43 Thoughts About Investing and the Economy

43 Thoughts About Investing and the Economy

“The business model of the majority of financial services companies relies on exploiting the fears, emotions, and lack of intelligence of customers. The worst part is that the majority of customers will never realize this.”

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Life on Wall Street Grows Less Risky - WSJ.com

Life on Wall Street Grows Less Risky - WSJ.com:

Michael Reed, who worked at the PDT desk for 16 years before leaving in 2010, laments the decline of the firm's trading culture. "Personally, I find it sad," he says. "They used to be a peer of Goldman Sachs. Now, they're just another retail brokerage."

The Summers Dossier [feedly]


 
 
Shared via feedly // published on The American Prospect // visit site
The Summers Dossier

To: President Obama

From: Your Political Team

Re: Larry Summers Vetting Report

 

Dear Mr. President,

Welcome home. You have several immense challenges in the coming days and weeks, including of course marshaling support for the Syria attack, dealing with the next artificial budget crisis contrived by the Republicans, and continuing to move forward with implementation of the Affordable Care Act against fierce partisan opposition.

This memo on Larry Summers's confirmation as Federal Reserve Chairman is written with all that in mind.

The staff investigation of Summers in anticipation of a potentially bruising confirmation hearing is now complete, and you face a tricky decision. On the one hand, there is no single smoking gun that disqualifies him outright. With a lot of political heavy lifting, we might get Summers confirmed. On the other hand, it would eat up a lot of political capital and credibility at a time when we are seeking to rebuild both, not to incur political debts needlessly.

Here are Summers's main substantive and political problems in getting confirmed.

There is a great deal of criticism that he is temperamentally unsuited to be Fed chairman. This is in one sense "soft" criticism, but politically it is real and widely shared. Even his supporters concede that he can be a bull in a china shop.

His Wall Street activities since leaving government will raise more than eyebrows. They will raise questions of flat-out conflicts of interest and bad judgment.

Since leaving government, Summers took a lot of money from Citigroup. As one of the key architects of the bail out, he was responsible for the decision to prop up Citi with hundreds of billions of dollars of public money and Federal Reserve cheap capital rather than breaking Citi up. As Fed Chair, he will be a principal regulator of too-big-to-fail banks including Citi.

At the very least, this looks terrible. He saves Citi management and shareholders, then he gets a nice pile of money from them for not much work, and now he is regulating them again. This revolving door at the Fed is so unusual that it doesn't even have applicable conflict of rules for chairmen. It's not possible for the chair to recuse himself because every major regulatory decision—capital standards, derivatives, Volcker Rule—affects Citi. If he is precluded from participating, he might as well not take the job.

There is also Summers's odd choice to join the board of directors of Lending Club, a lightly regulated quasi-bank, of the sort that the Fed will need to decide whether to regulate more tightly. Summers critics will ask what he was thinking. With several of the same players, he also joined the board of Square, an internet-based payments system.

Further, there is a lot of dirty laundry left over from Summers's tenure at Harvard both as university president before he served the administration and also since he returned as a senior professor. Much of this has been aired, but it has never been systematically subjected to a senate inquiry.

Summers's questioning the intellectual capacity of women contributed to his downfall, but in many ways it was the least of his problems. Far more serious were his penchant for overruling the Harvard endowment's professional money managers with impulsive investment decisions that cost Harvard billions, and his involvement in the Andrei Shleifer affair.

The most authoritative article on Shleifer and Summers appeared in the magazine Institutional Investor. Shleifer in the mid-1990s, while running the technical assistance program on Russian privatization underwritten by USAID and administered through Harvard Institute for International Development, enriched himself through investments based on privileged information. Eventually, after a criminal investigation, Harvard and Schleifer, during Summers's tenure as president, settled the criminal complaint by paying heavy fines.

Summers, a close friend of Shleifer, nominally recused himself, but acted to protect his friend and even kept Shleifer on as a full professor. Harvard ended up paying over $26 million in fines plus $10 to $15 million in legal fees to defend the actions of a corrupt professor of whose activities senior officials at the university, except for Summers, were unaware. It was the Shleifer affair, as much as anything else, that cost Summers the confidence of his faculty and his job. The details have never been the subject of a congressional inquiry, and could be extremely embarrassing with Summers testifying under oath.

Summers is also vulnerable for his activities since 2010. Harvard has a strict rule requiring that fulltime faculty spend at least 80 percent of their professional time on Harvard business. With all of his extracurricular Wall Street affairs, there is no realistic way that Summers could have met this rule. Either Harvard bent its own rules, or the companies on whose boards Summers served were violating their legal duties by using Summers as a marquee name or paying him in the expectation of future IOUs, but not as a true fiduciary. This will also be awkward for him (and us) to explain.

In that respect, Summers is also likely to be charged with hypocrisy on the subject of senior faculty freelancing. In 2001, as Harvard president, he railed against then Harvard professor Cornell West for West's pop culture activities, specifically for making a hip-hop CD. Summers called West to his office in October 2001 to complain, arguing that this was the sort of extra-curricular activity that brought embarrassment to the university. Summers critics might argue that hip-hop was pretty tame compared to working part time for Citi and Lending Club. Summers eventually drove West out, an act that did not endear him to the African American community.

There are also the well known policy questions of Summers having promoted the deregulation that led to the financial collapse, having bullied Brooksley Born, former chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in the late 1990s, for wanting government to explore ways to limit derivatives abuses, and his rather soft views of regulation in the context of the Dodd-Frank Act rules.

Politically, our efforts to create a sense of inevitability for Summers over the past several weeks seemed to be working. But then, contrary to the White House story about an easy confirmation, three leading Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee, advised us that under no circumstances will they vote for Summers, and that was leaked to the press. See this piece from last Friday's Wall Street Journal.

The New York Times also weighed in with a blistering anti-Summers editorial.

Even if we hold all other Democrats on the Committee, that makes us reliant on the Republicans to get Summers out of committee. As you know, we have redoubled our efforts to get our Wall Street friends to lobby Republicans to support Summers.

Other things being equal, Republicans should be favorable to Summers because of his soft views on regulation and his concerns about inflation. But other things are not equal. Most Republicans do not like him personally. They will be torn between giving Wall Street a vote for a friendly Fed chairman and embarrassing the White House. If they smell blood in the water, we probably cannot count on their support.

It's not at all whether we would prevent a runaway hearing. We have Committee Chairman Tim Johnson's commitment to try to keep the lid on. Johnson has the back office operations of big banks in his home state of South Dakota thanks to their lax consumer laws and is one of the most Wall Street-friendly Democrats in Congress.

However, Johnson is not going to short circuit a hearing if he has several committee members pressing for a full investigation. That would make him look bad for trying to railroad the nomination through.

We don't yet know who will ask to testify. But the list could include several high powered and prestigious people, such as other senators, former regulators, and senior Harvard officials, both present and former—people who could not be dismissed lightly. The hearing might drag on for days. We withdrew Tom Daschle as our Health and Human Services nominee for a lot less. It would not paint a pretty picture.

To reiterate, despite numerous conversations, we can't know which way the Republicans will play this. In principle, there is no "linkage" between the Fed nomination and other pending battles. But in practice, you don't have very many IOUs to call in with the Republicans and you need to consider if it makes the most sense to spend your limited bipartisan political capital on Summers.

One of our strongest cases for Summers is that he will reassure financial markets. But a confirmation hearing that turned out to be a donnybrook would do just the opposite. By contrast, we have unearthed nothing on the other leading candidate, Janet Yellen. A confirmation hearing for Yellen would be decorous, and the main opposition would be from monetary conservatives.

This raises one final question. The economy is still a lot softer than your economic team forecast. The Fed has been making noises about pulling back on monetary stimulus in the next month or two, a policy that would slow down the recovery. Summers has been more favorably inclined towards a pullback, while Yellen has stressed the need for continued stimulus to create jobs. Though she is not as personally well known to you and our economic team as Summers is, Yellen might actually pursue economic policies more in the administration's political interest.




Mark O'Friel
C: 914-907-7144
O: 617-903-0251
F : 419-710-3449


Thursday, September 05, 2013

Tuesday, September 03, 2013

A New Kind of Union - NYTimes.com

The pendulum has swung too far. Unions are too weak and management is too strong.

A New Kind of Union - NYTimes.com

Analysis - Caterpillar Plan Illustrates Risk of Variable Pay Plans - NYTimes.com

Analysis - Caterpillar Plan Illustrates Risk of Variable Pay Plans - NYTimes.com:

CEO's exempt themselves from employee's incentive based employment plan:

 "But unlike many rank-and-file employees, Oberhelman also participates in a medium-term incentive plan, which pays out cash each year based on three-year performance measures, providing a cushion from annual fluctuations.

As a result, Oberhelman's total cash incentive pay rose 2 percent last year, and his overall compensation jumped 32 percent, according to SEC filings."